Thursday, February 16, 2017

I Wrote a Letter




I wrote this Letter to the Editor, and it was published:



"For at least 18 months, I have read letter after letter, disparaging one “side” or the “other”.  People who don’t even know me, my family, or my friends have pre-judged us. There are undoubtedly letters that have pre-judged you too.
Hatred, rancor, and distrust drip from letters. Disapproving words about employees of the university that provides employment to thousands in our community, and which has educated millions over the years. Educators and students you have never met, yet you feel you know all about them because of something you heard somewhere from someone.
Every day you drive on the same roads; without knowing who is in the lane next to you, you trust they won’t do something stupid to endanger you—you have to trust that “libtard”. You go to the grocery store and stand in the same lines that I do, and we want the same thing—to get out fast, with correct change. The person who ensures our hamburgers are fully cooked might be one of those despised “snowflakes”. We sit side by side at the same health clinic and we both pray the educated staff can help our loved ones.
In times of crisis in our state, community, or in our countryside, we still need to be able to work together for a common goal. I will be working with you.
We will be able to do that if our differences do not become irreconcilable. If that happens, even heaven will be unable to help us."

I mean, really--is there any word in the English language more offensive than "Libtard"?! I guess that's the reason it exists at all, but I've only seen it as a printed word--I have never heard anyone actually say it. Perhaps I run with the "wrong" crowd, or perhaps it takes a special sort of person to actually use the word to describe another human being.
The internet has millions of good purposes, but this trolling has got to stop--we have allowed a subculture to be able to "say" ugly things to and about fellow human beings, and to be glib and thoughtless when responding to an issue that needs to be discussed in a civilized manner. Things that you would never, ever say out loud now find their way into print, and I honestly fear it will lead to "irreconcilable differences".
 

Sunday, January 15, 2017

"In the Event Of": A Sermon on Empathy



           
            I have been writing this sermon, in my head, since November 9th.

            For me, the results of the elections, from president all the way down to state representative, were devastating—a real blow to the gut. That morning, I found myself unable to even get out of bed—my mind was racing, thinking of all the things that would not happen. And then, I thought of all the things that could and WOULD happen. I cried.
            As I laid there and considered a different future, I did what I always seem to do—I thought about the things that were good in my life. I have a loving, supportive group of family and friends. I live in a safe and tolerant community, and the leaders of this community believe in equality for all. And, I belong to a church community that is amazing. Reflecting on that, I did feel better.
            So, I got up, and went to my computer. I checked my e-mail, and then went to Facebook. Oh. My. Goodness. It was like opening a floodgate, with pain and anguish and fear flowing out from all over the globe.
            Yes, it was a tough few days; I went from stasis to anger to despair back to stasis, and that’s how my loved ones were reacting too.
            I have never needed to come to church so much as I needed to that Sunday. I needed to be with this community, with this congregation of souls. It was like being covered by a blanket of love—every hug, every word, every little person I got to play with that day—every act uplifted me. And I hoped I was doing some comforting that day too; funny how reaching out to someone else makes you feel better too.
            I wish all my loved ones could have been with me that day. I know they need a blanket of love too.
            Looking back on that day, and so many days that have come after that, I kept thinking about those words that are said at the beginning of every commercial airplane flight: 
            In the event of a loss of cabin pressure, the panels above your seat will open, and oxygen masks will drop down. If this happens, place the mask over your nose and mouth, and adjust it as necessary. Be sure to adjust your own mask before helping others.”
            Because that’s exactly what has been happening—we have been taking care of one another. When we have felt like we are on solid ground, we have been turning to others, helping them find a foothold, helping them find their own “oxygen mask”. And if my day is hard, people have been helping me.
            Empathy.
            We have had empathy for one another.
            And oh how I wish we ALL had empathy for one another.
            Empathy, as defined by Merriam-Webster is “the action of understanding, being aware of, being sensitive to and vicariously experiencing the feelings, thoughts, and experiences of another. Being aware of and sharing another person’s feelings, experiences, and emotions.
            Empathy is more action-oriented than sympathy. We can be “sorry for your loss”, but sometimes it takes US experiencing a loss ourselves before we can truly understand what loss means. It’s interesting to note that the word “empathy” entered the English language a few centuries after the word “sympathy”. I’m not sure why that is, but perhaps we have to evolve to a certain level in able to feel compassion for one another?
            In the book Why Empathy Matters J. D. Trout remarks, “Empathy’s local reach may have served humans well when neighbors in need were right before us…but now we live in a vast land encompassing a diverse population with people not like us, all in one nation.  Was it easier to feel for our neighbor when we could see they were starving, or being physically denied housing?  Was it easier to empathize when our neighbors looked like us, worshipped the way we did, answered to the same boss?
            I think it was.
            I think it is.
            When I was on the local school board, I was always amazed at the parents who would speak to us, concerned about X Y or Z. For instance, why couldn’t they park in front of the school to wait for their child every day? It was just easier than parking and getting out and meeting their child at the door! They just could not understand that their parking, in the bus lane, was causing a problem for at least 50 other people. I called them “tree people”; people who were so focused on their one tree, they missed the whole forest, the wider community.  My fear is that as our society becomes more complex, with all different varieties of people, we will find it easier to focus on our “trees”, instead of the whole “forest”. And, I fear we will elect representatives who will also be short-sighted, lacking empathy. I witnessed this a few years ago during the debate about the Affordable Care Act. There were at least two town hall meetings, sponsored by the local Tea Party. I went to both of them, and I was astounded by those who maintained that we didn’t need the Affordable Care Act because our local churches “would take care of their own”. That’s an actual quote:  “We will take care of our own.” The implausibility of that statement, plus the total lack of empathy exhibited by the speaker, still astounds me. It just didn’t occur to them that there weren’t enough churches, temples, mosques, or synagogues in the entire country to sufficiently “take care of their own”. Or that there were people who needed affordable health care and who did not go to church. There was a total lack of the ability to “walk in another’s shoes”.
            And, I fear this, as a nation, is who we are becoming.
            More than half of us cared so little for the rest that they couldn’t bother to vote. They were so lacking in empathy that they chose to stay home rather than to vote for those who have no vote…no voice—children, the disabled, the immigrant.
            Because of this, we have elected a president who has taken our ability to empathize away from us. Instead of a more small “d” democratic society, where we work for one another, the man who will take office on Friday was elected in part for his promise that “I” will do it for “You”. The problem is, he’s probably the least compassionate, least empathetic president that we’ve elected in our lifetimes, and therefore he will never be able to know what another person truly needs. I watched President Obama’s Farewell Address this week, and listened to him “spell this out without spelling it out”. The man who currently holds the office recognizes his successor’s weakness, and wants us to be aware of it too. As President Obama said in his farewell address:
            But we’re not where we need to be. All of us have more work to do. After all, if every economic issue is framed as a struggle between a hard-working white middle class and undeserving minorities, then workers of all shades will be left fighting for scraps while the wealthy withdraw further into their private enclaves…Going forward, we must uphold laws against discrimination…That’s what our Constitution and highest ideals require. But laws alone won’t be enough. Hearts must change. If our democracy is to work in this increasingly diverse nation, each one of us must try to heed the advice of one of the great characters in American fiction, Atticus Finch, who said, You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view…until you climb into his skin and walk around in it.”
            It’s like the President was writing my sermon for me!
            He goes on to say:
            For blacks and other minorities, it means tying our own struggles for justice to the challenges that a lot of people in this country face—the refugee, the immigrant, the rural poor, the transgender American, and also the middle-aged white man who from the outside may seem like he’s got all the advantages, but who’s seen his world upended by economic, cultural, and technological change. For white Americans, it means acknowledging that the effects of slavery and Jim Crow didn’t suddenly vanish in the ‘60s; that when minority groups voice discontent, they’re not just engaging in reverse racism or practicing political correctness; that when they wage peaceful protest, they’re not demanding special treatment, but the equal treatment our Founders promised.”
            For the past eight years, we have had a president who saw what was happening all over the country, who listened to the voices of all kinds of people, and who could put his compassion into words that we could understand.  He challenged us to be empathetic, and to put that empathy into action. I have serious doubts that the next president will be capable of understanding others, of listening to the voices of others, and will lack the ability to inspire us to work for a common good.
            So, that leaves much to us; much for us to do for each other. Once our own oxygen mask is on, once we feel we are emotionally and physically stable, we will be able to help others. And let me stress right now:  If you are not able, on any given day or week or month, to be able to do anything else but take care of you and yours, you get a pass. Like Elizabeth Carrier-Hall stated last week, we have to allow ourselves to be, to be whole. We have to be honest about our limitations; we have to be vulnerable, and have to be able to share our doubts. The rest of us will help, will carry on, until you are able. Put on your own mask, secure it. THEN, help others to be empathetic.
            We can start with our children (and with our not-so-young). Empathy is learned by repetition (and as we repeat the importance of empathy, we reinforce it for ourselves—a win/win). As we saw today, we have some pretty empathetic kids here, and I thank those of you who have had a hand in that—parents, teachers, friends. When my kids were young, they came home with stories about someone crying in class, about someone who was mean to them for no reason. I would ask them questions like, “Why do you think they were sad? Were they feeling sick? Do you think they were angry about something, and got mad at you instead?” I really wanted them to consider the other person’s point of view, to be empathetic. It was hard—really hard—sometimes they made up with the other kid faster than I did!
            We can do this with our friends too; ask questions—challenge them to figure out “why?” I have a co-worker from another country, and he often asks me, “Why?”—he asks me to explain the actions of a government official. Often it’s frustrating to try to answer him, because there is no good answer; I can’t figure out what another is thinking. But when he asks, I am forced to consider. And it’s a good exercise. I cannot be flippant, I cannot say, “They’re just crazy”. Because he truly wants to know, and I really want to give him a good answer.  I…we should also force ourselves to see, read, understand another’s point of view.  Ask someone to explain to you why they feel the way they do. ASK—don’t assume you know the answer. In order to empathize, we have to know.
            And yes, we can encourage our co-workers, our family members as they try (or don’t try) to be empathetic. You can share stories that you find thought-provoking (it’s really easy to do on Facebook—just click that button!). All of you could join a book group, and challenge yourselves to move out of your comfort zone. And, GO TO MOVIES! I’m not kidding. Take the whole family to see “Hidden Figures”—it’s powerful to actually see lives, so unlike our own, in film. For every thousand words that can be written, sometimes it’s the briefest of moments on the screen that can have a greater impact. If you don’t believe me, perhaps Meryl Streep can convince you. As she accepted the Cecil B. DeMille award at the Golden Globes last Sunday, she said:
            An actor’s only job is to enter the lives of people who are different from us, and let you feel what that feels like … Tommy Lee Jones said to me, “Isn’t it such a privilege, Meryl, just to be an actor?” Yeah, it is. And we have to remind each other of the privilege and the responsibility of the act of empathy.”
            Truth be told, this is already a very empathetic group of people—I see it on Sundays, when hugs are freely given. I hear it during the offertory, as coins fall to help “Change for Change”. And, I am challenged to be empathetic during every sermon that is given here.
            If you find yourself in need, if you find others in need, make sure you let us know. I am certain we will be making phone calls, and sending lots of e-mails to our government representatives in the coming years. We already have been, and we will need to continue to do so. Our country depends on it.  As J. D. Trout writes in Why Empathy Matters:
            Empathy is central to our humanity. But rather than elevating empathy, public dialogue has marginalized it, giving way to authoritative and sober pronouncements that we can’t help everyone. But the truth is, government efforts have flagged. No doubt, closing the empathy gap is a difficult task. We must balance the forces of emotion and rationality…Together with empathy, our system of rational and deliberate thought can now extend our moral concern to people further from our private lives, but equally deserving.”  
            There is much work to be done. But we can help each other. The coming days, months, years might be scary. Sometimes it will seem like we’re going one step forward and two steps back. We will need to be courageous and compassionate. One person cannot do it all, and on any given day, we all cannot do it all. But every day, we can do something.
            I would like to close with the words of Martin Luther King, Jr., a man who knew much about all of this. In his Nobel Peace Prize speech, he said this:
            I refuse to accept despair as the final response to the ambiguities of history. I refuse to accept the idea that the "isness" of man's present nature makes him morally incapable of reaching up for the eternal "oughtness" that forever confronts him. I refuse to accept the idea that man is mere flotsom and jetsom in the river of life, unable to influence the unfolding events which surround him. I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality.”
            Our challenge? Refuse to give up.  To reach out. And to be kind.