This is what I said this morning:
"From the beginning of time, there have been literary
critics. Can’t you imagine the first images, drawn on a wall, and two people
telling the artist that the feet are too big? Today, I’m not talking about
criticism. I’m talking about censorship of written materials. Banned books. Not
to be confused with band books (books about bands)—by the way, I would love to
read a book about our House Band, if one is ever written!
From the time ideas were first written down, from
the time stories were first inked on parchment, governmental officials tried to
control who saw them. The word “censor” can be traced back to 443 BCE, when the
first Office of Censor was established in Rome, to maintain the census and
“supervise public morals”. The first censorship law was found in China in 300
CE. And, many of you probably know that Socrates was forced to drink poison in
399 BCE, for the crime of using his words to “corrupt youth” and “acknowledge unorthodox
divinities.” At the very same time, there was pushback; Euripides, in his
plays, defended the right of freedom of expression.
But I think it was the invention of the printing
press that gave governmental and religious leaders the most reason to panic.
Prior to that, they could control what was disseminated to the masses. When printed material could be easily
produced and distributed, the Catholic Church was no longer THE word of God;
“other religious viewpoints” could be, and were, read and discussed. It’s no surprise that it was a pope--Pope
Paul IV--who ordered the first Index of Prohibited Books in 1559. The Index was
updated and reissued 20 times by different popes; these indexes banned books
for their “heretical or ideologically dangerous content”. The most famous author,
banned by the early Church, was probably Galileo.
It got better though. The more people learned, the
more they demanded to be informed (funny how that works). Sweden was the first
country, in 1766, to abolish censorship and introduce a law guaranteeing
freedom of the press. Denmark-Norway followed suit in 1770. In 1787 that young
country, the United States of America, made the First Amendment of the
Constitution of the United States one that guarantees freedom of speech and the
press. Not all countries that purport to have freedom of speech and press
actually do, and not all countries perfectly adhere to those liberties. I
remember when I lived in England in the mid 1980’s, and the book, “Spycatcher”, was banned by the British
government on the grounds that it revealed secrets about their Intelligence
Services. Funny enough, it was banned by an English court, so you could still
buy it in Scotland! Guess what book our friends wanted to read? Guess what book
we had mailed to us from the United States? Yeah….”Spycatcher”.
I’ve always believed that if you teach a person to
read, they are free…to have their own thoughts in their own minds. The ability
to read is probably the single most important skill a person can possess. Most
of us have seen youngsters struggle to learn to read. They look at the letters,
try to make sense of the order of them on the page, try to sound out that first
word. Then another and another. They read and understand their first sentence
and it’s like a literal lightbulb goes on in their head—wow!!! I read that and
understood that!!! I think I might need to do that again!!!
We probably don’t notice that moment in a child’s
life when an idea is read and understood by them, or when they suddenly
disagree with something they’ve read, but it does happen…and more lightbulbs go
on. These are important moments too; ones that set them up for a lifetime of
thought and contemplation and reasoning.
For some of us, our parents taught us to read. For a
majority of us, we learned to read in school. Most of us learned to read by
looking at a book, and as we became more proficient, we read another book, and
another, and so on. If we were fortunate, our classroom might have a small
bookcase of books. If we grew up in a good school system, we had a school
library. And, if we were lucky, we had a public library in our town, with
shelves and shelves of all kinds of books for all ages. Free to read. Or, free
to take home if we had a valid library card.
But where there are books, where there are pages and
pages and pages of different thoughts and ideas, where there are gathered
authors’ tomes about magic, farting dogs, menstruation, spirituality,
communism, or evolution, there will also be people who are trying to prevent
others from reading those pages--censors. In extreme cases, censors will burn
books. In 1683, on orders from the king, the entire University of Oxford
library collection was burned. In 1933, some 20,000 books in Germany were
ordered destroyed by Goebbels. In the United States, periodically some
religious sect will order its’ followers to bring “offensive material” to a
Friday night bonfire, and religious excitement will grow as books, CDs, and
DVDs all go up in flames. The thought of all those creations, with beautiful
thoughts and ideas and images, just like we’ve been reading to you this morning,
going up in flames...it makes me want to cry. Books take me places I’ve never
considered going. Books give me important perspective and force me to look at
something from another point of view. I cannot imagine watching my favorites,
and soon to be favorites, all going up in smoke.
The thought of a free public library, open to all,
probably would give some religious leaders of old the vapors! Unthinkable in
those days when the poor and uneducated could be told what to think! But today,
censorship and book banning in the free world are done more often by private
citizens than public entities. Parents are often concerned about protecting
children from visual materials. While laudable, there is a fine line between
protecting their child, and preventing ALL children from reading a certain
book. If only everyone’s morality included the declaration “to seek the truth
in love”….
It’s also important to realize that a book can be
“challenged”, but until it’s actually removed from public view, it’s not considered
“banned”. Currently, parents are the top challengers, and school libraries are
their main target. Today, the top reasons books are challenged are for sex
(sexual acts AND sexuality), profanity, or racism. Every school district and
every public library district in the U.S. should have developed a set of
questions that are asked when a book is challenged by a patron. That’s what
good librarians do, after all. At the library where I work, we have a document
titled, “Complaint/Book Action Request”. It asks for the author, the title, the
publisher of the item. It asks for the name and address of the person
initiating the request, and asks if the person is representing themselves, an
organization, or “other”. Then there are a set of questions:
1. To
what in the book do you object (cite pages)?
2. What
do you feel might be the result of reading this book?
3. For
what age group WOULD YOU recommend this book?
4. Is
there anything good about this book?
5. Did
you read the entire book? If not, what parts?
6. Are
you aware of the judgment of this book by literary critics?
7. What
do you believe is the theme of this book?
8. What
would you like the library to do about this book?
While I work in a public library, I am not a librarian; I do not have a
degree in Library Science. That doesn’t mean that patrons never come up to me
and give me their opinions—they tell me, frequently, that a book is terrible or
a movie is too violent. It’s been a long time since someone has told me that we
should remove something from our collection. About 10 years ago, a young woman
came up and flung a video on to the counter. “You shouldn’t have this in your
collection,” she said. “It’s not historically accurate!” Clearly angry, she
turned and stomped off. When I opened the case to check the video in, I noticed
the titled: “Noah’s Ark”!
In closing, I would like to take a moment to tell
you how important your tax dollars are for the survival of your local library.
A large part of library funding comes from local property taxes. In 2010, the
Indiana Constitution was amended to include a property tax cap. While some may
argue the cap was great for landowners, it was (and is) a disaster for local
services, including your local library. So, public libraries in Indiana are
struggling—struggling to provide services to their patrons while dealing with
ever decreasing funding. Libraries need you; they need your support. So, pay
those fines, attend those book fairs, and for goodness sakes, when someone
complains about paying too much in taxes, remind them that their tax dollars
fund libraries…places
that have books that open minds and educate the willing and take you to exotic
places, right from the comfort of your easy chair.
Let’s talk books! Do you have a favorite “Banned
Book”? I’ve provided lists, found in your Order of Service, to maybe prompt
your memories. And, to open this
discussion, as you peruse the list, I have to say I found it interesting to
learn that Mark Twain's “The Adventures
of Huckleberry Finn”, was first banned in 1885 by the Concord Public Library
in Massachusetts, and this same book was still in jeopardy of censorship in
1984. At the same time, I’m a bit in awe of an author whose work is still
talked about 99 years later!"

No comments:
Post a Comment